Skip to content Skip to footer

Why People Leave in the First 90 Days

When somebody leaves a job within the first three months, the assumption is usually money. Occasionally it is. Far more often the reason is something smaller and more fixable that nobody addressed in the first fortnight. This is worth understanding from both sides of the desk, because the same four causes come up again and again, and every one of them is cheaper to prevent than the rehire that follows.

The Schedule Was Not What Was Described

This is the most common one and it is almost always avoidable. Somebody accepts a role described as day shift and discovers it rotates. Somebody is told forty hours and gets fifty five in the busy weeks, or thirty in the quiet ones. Somebody arranges childcare around a finish time that turns out to be flexible in one direction only.

People rarely quit because a schedule is demanding. They quit because they built their life around a different one and now it does not work. A person who knew about the rotation before they accepted will usually manage it. The same person, finding out in week two, is already looking.

The fix is unglamorous. Say the real schedule out loud before anyone accepts, including the overtime expectations in the busy season and what happens when somebody calls in sick.

Nobody Planned The First Week

A surprising number of first days consist of arriving, waiting, and being handed to whoever happens to be free. There is no equipment ready, no login, no clear task, and the person who was supposed to be showing them around is covering somebody else’s line.

That first week does more to set expectations than anything in the interview. Somebody who spends it feeling like an inconvenience will read every later friction as confirmation. Somebody whose first day was organised gives the job the benefit of the doubt for months.

It does not require a formal programme. Knowing who is meeting them at the door, having their equipment ready, and giving them one real task by the end of day two covers most of it.

There Was No Clear Person To Ask

New people always have questions, and in the first weeks they have a lot of them. If there is no obvious person to bring those to, one of two things happens. They interrupt whoever is nearest and gradually feel like a nuisance, or they stop asking and start guessing.

The guessing is the expensive one. Mistakes made quietly in week three get found in week six, by which point the new starter has concluded they are bad at the job and the supervisor has concluded they are careless. Neither was true at the start.

Naming one person as the point of contact solves this almost entirely, and it costs nothing. The new starter should be told that name on day one, and told plainly that asking is expected rather than tolerated.

The Work Was Different From The Description

Sometimes the job on the floor genuinely is not the job in the posting. The listing said assembly and most of the shift is loading. It said light lifting and it is not light.

Job descriptions drift over time, get copied from an older role, or describe how a job is supposed to work rather than how it does. That is understandable and it still causes turnover, because somebody who took the job for one reason is now doing something else.

A short honest conversation before a start date fixes more of this than any amount of correction afterwards. So does asking the person doing the job now what the day actually looks like.

What Candidates Can Do

Ask specific questions before you accept, and ask them of somebody who knows. What time does the shift actually start and finish, and does it rotate. How much overtime is normal in the busy season and is it required or offered. Who will I report to, and who do I ask when they are not there. What does a typical day involve, hour by hour.

Then, in the first two weeks, say something when it does not match. Most problems in a new job are solvable in week one and much harder by week eight, and the person who raises it early is treated as engaged rather than difficult. If you were placed through a staffing agency, that is exactly what they are there for.

What Employers Can Do

Describe the job honestly, including the parts that are hard. You will lose a few candidates at the offer stage and keep far more of the ones who accept, which is the better trade by a distance.

Plan the first week. Equipment ready, a named contact, a real task early. Then check in at the end of week one and again at week four, and ask a question specific enough to get a real answer. Is anything about the shift not working for you gets further than how is it going.

Pay attention to who is doing the training. The person who onboards a new starter shapes their view of the whole company more than any policy does.

Why The First 90 Days Are Worth The Effort

Every one of these exits costs more than it looks. There is the time your supervisor already spent training, the overtime the rest of the crew absorbs while the role sits open, and the weeks of recruiting to do it all again. The people covering the gap notice, and that is where the second wave of turnover usually comes from.

None of the four causes above needs a budget. They need a conversation before the start date and somebody paying attention for the first month.

How Employment Solutions Can Help

At Employment Solutions we sit between both sides of this, which means we see the early exits and what caused them. Before we place anybody we confirm the real schedule, the real work and who they report to, because a placement that ends in week three has not helped the employer or the person.

For candidates, that means you know what you are walking into. For employers, it means we screen for fit with the shift and the environment rather than the job title alone, and we stay in contact after the start date so a small problem gets raised while it is still small.

If you are hiring, or you are considering a new role, talk to us first. Your next opportunity could be closer than you think.